Fallout Review

Fallout Review

The Oveview

I will admit I am biased, I love all the Fallout games and even have own pip boy. I have spent hours over the divested radioactive remnants of the United States, listening to events long past and talking to those still living and populating the new world. Being a Bethesda game, there was a lot of story and a lot of glitches. Downloading the DLC for Fallout three was an art. The glitching was legendary and the restarts were annoying, but we did it because the game was so much fun. There were numerous complaints at the time, but it was before the era of the Mass Effect Ending outcry. Bethesda was notorious for not patching and everything was basically as is. Sure we complained and forums were filled with gifs and venting, however it didn’t have an impact. Let’s fast forward to now and times have changed and companies have to respond to the avalanche of social media and the every lofty goal of the perfect sandbox.

No Mans Sky was the first to hit that wall. Its premiere did not live up to the hype and the company listened to players tear the game apart, in detail, all over the internet. But through the chaff, there were some very salient points and the developers have made multiple improvements that pleased their audience and took the game closer to that sandbox multiplayer world where a player could make their own story. Part of the success of this was that were not loaded with a baggage of lore and history and they emerged on the scene dress and new allowing players to tell play their own stories without being influenced by a franchise.

Fallout 76’s Burden

It’s what holds it back as a sandbox and not delivering the world the fans are accustomed to. For those who haven’t played any of the games, the best features of the games were the evolved NPC’s and story lines. You could explore and met folks in passing, help or loot them. There were towns, stories and drama you could get tangled in, or not. With the release of Fallout4 they introduced a better building system.A popular feature that became one of the games most beloved. I can attest to myself and friends spending hours just building towns rather than shooting mutants. With the onset of mods and then creative club, we could build more! Its been incorporated as your campsite Fallout76, which as Bethesda is the champ of bugs, it may take multiple tries to place because a stray weed is in the way.

By its nature as a giant battlefield for players to survive, the logistics they set up makes everything transient. When you sign back in, everything you made, your mark your presence as a community, is gone. As you wander, you listen and read journals left by people, but the people themselves are gone. So what attaches you to the game? Get to the highest level, kill the strongest beast, kill other players, and then what? This is Fallout, it carries with it the weight of its predecessors, but now Its just a shooter survival game where you are no longer the lone wanderer, but can have a team, to kill monsters and other players. It’s beautiful and killing things is a great part of video games. But thats all thats left. It truly is a wasteland. One where if you’re a PvE kinda player, you don’t have a choice, players will come and kill you, and withe he survival aspect of the game where you lose some gear when you die, it’s a huge turn off. The addition of micro-transaction for skins and such is so aggravating and infuriating and a sad sign of things to come.


I can recognize what Bethesda was trying to accomplish with this game. It’s made to play like the current multiplayer battle field games. And it does, and it does it well when its not glitching. What it is not, is a Fallout experience we expect or are used to, it is not Fallout 5. This is what burdens it and this is what the fan-base is complaining about. It’s actually unfair that it is criticized for being a game it was never meant to be, except for the advertising that led us to believe it kinda was. The fans have called foul.

Leigh-Alexandra Jacob is a visual effects artist and creative director.  She’s the founder of Atomic Dumpling.  You can reach her at leigh@atomicdumpling.com.



As a Blog dedicated to creativity and design you may wonder… why jeans?

Know Your Customer

Jeans are one of the most poorly designed products to this day, for women, in my opinion. Now I know the huge problem of “female “marketing, which is basically make it pink and charge more for the same product. It’s a lazy and degrading philosophy that most women see through. It’s also a vast missed market of opportunity to make things women actually want. Like jeans, more specifically, jeans with pockets.

Woman come in all shapes and a one size fits all when it comes to jeans is almost impossible. If you have hips, but no waist, you have to cinch-up like a crown royal bag. If you have nothing going on back there, just wide and flat like an aircraft carrier, you get the “gap” whenever you sit, where friends can throw spare change for fun.  To further complicate we have short-wasted ladies and long wasted, and jeans that can be hip-huggers or mom jeans. Worst of all, jeans made for women have no pockets. Why? On average you can fit may be a quarter and a tube of Chapstick. One piece of gum, well one piece of Trident gum.  Even cargos for women, if you can find them, are capri and the pockets are only big enough to hold one credit card, maybe.

Here we are paying minimum fifty dollars, up into the hundreds for jeans, and Men’s Levies start at twenty bucks!

Now I have worn the hundreds of dollars jeans, and they look good. I can’t carry my phone, keys or Id, unless I have purse or a coat with adequate pockets. I think this is the origin of my hate against lady jeans, I am not a purse person. I can’t be trusted with them. I have tried and have left them in restrooms and friends’ houses all across America. I need pockets, jeans with pockets. Ones that don’t slide my phone out of its back pocket when I stand up in the restroom stall and send it into the bowl. I have to hold my phone in my mouth because putting it on any surface is gross, and I may forget to take it with me. I need working pockets, but women jeans don’t have them. They are there so the jeans look normal, not to serve any function.

Pink Product Fail

I got fed up and bought some men’s Levies, they are their new line for guys called Flex, because men like words like Flex, rather than stretch, because ladies’ jeans stretch and men jeans flex like bulging muscles instead of stretching under muffin tops. They are also slim fit, because that’s a lady’s jeans standard and the pockets go almost to my knees.  They look good, feel good and cost twenty bucks.  So, my question is, why can’t we have them? What is the issue in the design that stops all manufacturers from making them? Do women not look good with real pockets? Do women not want to wear men’s jeans outright that they must buy “boyfriend” style jeans at two to three times the cost? I have never worn “boyfriend” jeans and I can’t vouch for the pockets. Why not just buy the same jeans your boyfriend wears?

And this is the problem. Fashion is a beast unto itself and I am not questioning or tackling it, I am asking about a fundamental difference in a staple of everyday clothing and work wear. Is it not feminine to have pockets? Is the line ruined? Why are we concerned about a line in jeans that we throw on to hit the grocery store? Because in woman jeans, designer or every day, it doesn’t matter.

No pockets for you!

That again, is design flaw. If you’re out and want jeans that look painted on, I can understand, but if you’re out to buy you aren’t wearing those jeans, you wear the ones that need functioning pockets. But we don’t because some imaginary rule forbids it. This we can change. To do that we have to look at things beyond who we always do them and begin questioning why we do it and change it if it is no longer working. 

Leigh-Alexandra Jacob is a visual effects artist and creative director.  She’s the founder of Atomic Dumpling.  You can reach her at leigh@atomicdumpling.com.

Art and Critics

Art and Critics

So, I began this with video games and I have been encouraged to continue to do so. By encouraged I mean heavily implied that’s what I am going to do.

But, but, but!

My freedom of choice!

How can I be creative with the yoke of oppression on me?  

I am joking, mostly.  In video games this has become a serious issue. It’s one that has led to death threats, promises of violence, and terrible behavior on the part of gamers.

Mass Effect 3 had a wobbly ending.

There are those who will give you a wall of text on the ins and outs with precisely all the minuscule aspects of this ending.  More so, that they felt that it was a travesty, a crime against nature, and God. They bombarded BioWare with these messages.  More that, the company put out a “fix” to address many of the dominant issues gamers had.

I only had one problem with it.  How the hell did the ground team get on the ship after you saw them smacked around like ping pong balls?

The answer to this amazing feat, I felt they addressed admirably. I am a sucker for the happy ending and it was nice to get closure with all the NPC characters. Everything else folks wanted superfluous.  I have you know, I also didn’t send death threats or walls of texts to BioWare.

I’ve just brought up a very serious topic and we as gamers need to talk about this.  How do threats and abuse effect one’s creativity? Who would want to make something or fix something for someone who called them names or threated their lives?

This is the sticky bits because this tends to get people flamed or even doxed. 

It’s like cooking a giant multi course meal and having it thrown at you because you didn’t give them the right dessert. Yet, BioWare didn’t balk outwardly, they took in what was said and remade the ending for their fans. In no way are they obligated to do this no matter what rabid fans will say. In the end, they are a company and can do what they want, but they stepped up and provided another alternative.

The obligation to fans is to entertain them with a game, sometimes you hit and sometimes you miss. That isn’t the point I am debating.  To redo the entire ending was a large complicated and costly uptake.  It was also one of unprecedented of it size.

So, would you, oh reader, as an artist do the same thing?

Man, I took the long way around to get here huh? Artists have critics, wanted and certainly unwanted. How do they affect your art and should they? Where is the line, or is there one? A simple question with layered answers.

I can be positively bubbly here and say you should let it inspire you (which you totally should.) For example, I made an amazing still life in school through a wall of anger because I didn’t want to work on that at all. There will always be critics, hopefully constructive ones.  And, I just want to point out that death threats and the like aren’t criticism. 

How critics affect you is up to you. Sometimes they should be ignored, but sometimes they can share a perspective with you that’s fresh and stimulating. I have never felt that others should dictate your art to you.  But, they can open your eyes to new possibilities and avenues you couldn’t see previously.

Stories Need Change

Stories Need Change

Last time, I was talking about the art of the story and how it can draw someone in and form a connection. This week I want to point out that sometimes the story needs to change.

Pop Culture & Franchising

Saint’s Row is a satire game (Koch Media/Deep Silver).

It takes its cues from popular culture. It is irreverent, crass, smart and often bizarre. The first game out though was a very different creature. You as the protagonist didn’t even talk, something which all the later games mock themselves for. It was sold as something like Grand Theft Auto (GTA). Sadly, it was no GTA, since Rockstar had that niche firmly mastered and crowned king of the arena.

So, what do you do when you have a possible franchise that can’t compete?

You change.

This is what hold so many people back in everything from personal to professional life. Change is scary. Change is a risk. You could fail. Here’s the thing though. How boring is it to just tread water forever? In all things, you must change or die. Now I’m not suggesting that you do a complete 180 or that you should radically alter things all the time. No, I’m saying change is good, sometimes you need a little, sometimes you need massive amounts. It brings new life to your world and opens new doors. Yeah ice cream is scrumptious, but not for every meal.

Creative Context in Video Games

How does ice cream concern Saint’s Row?  It doesn’t literally. Metaphorically though, Saint’s Row stopped serving you ice cream and hit you with pie. They saw that they were not going to go anywhere with the original model, so they changed and adapted.

This is a huge part of creativity. They took a risk and tested the waters in Saint’s Row 2 and it worked, so then they decided to really push the envelope in 3 and it was fantastic.

Now, even if you didn’t like the game, you could see how they branded themselves as a unique entity. They were not just another copy or want to be, they kind of created their own genre. This is because they stepped back, looked at what they had and instead of giving up, they invested. Which is part and parcel of being creative.

Even if you have a set style, you should grow with it. You can’t regurgitate the same thing over and over. For example, Tim Burton has a very singular look and feel.  He never wants to tell the same story.  His projects have his style, but each one is unique.

I will always remember the one art teacher who said (or plagiarized someone smarter), that a sign of a great artist is what they do with their mistakes. The great ones use them or learn from them. They don’t let them hold them back. Creativity is not always easy and there will be failures. Just last night I tried to be creative with some lemon bread, even the dog wouldn’t eat it and she eats cat poop. However, I will continue to bake and make everyone taste it, because the pistachio bread was fabulous. Motley tried to sample some more on her own, luckily tinfoil makes noise when kitty teeth are trying to pry it open.

In closing, after much rambling, what I am saying is be flexible, be aware, and don’t be satisfied with just treading water.


Leigh-Alexandra Jacob is a visual effects artist and creative director.  She’s the founder of Atomic Dumpling.  You can reach her at leigh@atomicdumpling.com.

Gaming Experience

I’m the resident gamer in the company.  I enjoy video games and experience them in a unique way. I talk about this a bit in a previous article.


It’s unique because it’s me, not you. We may have parallels, but my reality bubble is not yours (and vice versa).  I’m pointing this out for those that want to generalize and say “That’s not what games are like for me.”  I will answer, ‘exactly, they are not.’  Some might agree with me, some may not. This makes no one right or wrong. That’s my disclaimer, because this is solely my opinion.

We all have ways to relieve the stress of our lives. For me, sometimes I like to use video games. It allows me a level of immersion where the world fades and Its nonsense and mindless and sometimes can touch you in ways that surprise. I like story, in fact, most games I play must have story. Also, I suck at platforms. seriously, Little Big Planet was embarrassing.

So far, I have over a hundred hours in Dragon Age, Inquisition (BioWare). I finished with one race and class, and now I am trying another. In doing so, I can say that, yes the game is mostly the same.  But, it also has a consistent story thread.  And there is this important experience for each choice you make, so choices matter. Some are small, but each choice has a meaning and there are consequences.  Which keeps you invested in the game.

Difference in Games

I also have a hundred hours in The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim (Bethesda Softworks), yet I have never finished the main story arc of the game.

Skyrim tries to immerse you, but in a completely different way. Borrowing heavily from its Fallout brethren, it uses a very similar combat system and animations. Now let me say for equal comparison, that Inquisition also borrows from its own siblings Mass Effect (BioWare). There are always parts that make you feel something in that moment.  In example, it was amusing to see Liara’s head tilt and sashay away in Inquisition.

Now I am not going to say one is better than the other.  Each game is different and a new experience, so its apples and oranges.  You can’t make a blanket statement like that.  Both, Skyrim and Inquisition are amazing games.  This is entirely about immersion.  It’s about ‘how did I fall into and interact with the world’.

How did they hold my attention and keep it?  

I played Skyrim first, and I had played a Fallout games already.  So, I was familiar with Bethesda style. The main storyline, frankly, reminded me of a lose/lose tale in Fallout New Vegas. Yet, even without a happy ending, it was an ending you could live with.

I was more caught up with the downloadable content (DLC). Specifically, I’m referring to the Dawnguard DLC.  This was far more immersive than the main game. 

What do I mean by that? 

I mean that the NPCs around you were fleshed out, they had history and interacted. Serena was a well-rounded NPC who inevitably, totally, friend-zones you.  

But, another character stands out from the main game.  What about Lydia?

Yeah sure, she is sworn to carry your burdens, but what else is there to this character? You can play alongside her almost the entire game and yet you know really nothing about her nor are there any interaction or meaningful dialogs. You can even marry her and turn her into a shop keeper with no store. It’s the same for all your companions.

I was left wanting more from the main game. (I also hated all the bards, but that’s for another time.) My immersion in the game came from moments of exploration and investigation.    I loved the open world and finding new places and things.  I really enjoyed the adventure. Emotionally though, Skyrim never touched me other than to annoy me, seriously, those stupid Bards and those damn chickens!  You could die from accidental chicken killing!  Who does that?!

How things differed

In contrast, Inquisition gave me goosebumps at times with the character interactions. Anyone who says they didn’t get some feels from the song, is kidding you. I guess I’m a big softie, I like the emotional touches that move the story along and connect you to it. I still remember where I was when Aeris died, but I can’t tell you what I did for my 21st birthday.  Admittedly, alcohol may have played a small part in that.

What does this all have to do with art? Everything!

Stories are art.  Being able to pull someone into a new world is wonderful. Having a story touch someone is the same as touching them with a beautiful picture, film, or music. Therefore, art can be everywhere and not just hung up on a wall in a museum. It is the very reason we must encourage creativity when and where we find it. 

This the principle Atomic Dumpling was founded on.  To create art in every possible form, to encourage it, and to help others with it.

Leigh-Alexandra Jacob is a visual effects artist and creative director who founded Atomic Dumpling.  You can reach her at leigh@atomicdumpling.com.